Today's economy demands that employers plan carefully and creatively to ensure that the design of their defined benefit (DB), defined contribution (DC) or hybrid plans, as well as other retirement income programs, will meet their goals and employees' needs over the long term.

Retirement plan design "fads" may come and go, but our consultants will never jump to conclusions about clients' needs. We approach a retirement plan design project — whether for DB, DC or hybrid plans — utilizing our proprietary plan design software and conduct a comprehensive process that will leave you with a top-notch plan.

How we'll help you with retirement plan design

Our team promises to provide the advice and expertise that's right for you, and not use a one-size-fits-all approach. However we do have a general framework for how we approach plan design, which includes:

• Gathering essential facts about current plans and member demographics as well as the overarching employee benefit, HR and business frameworks in which those retirement plans operate
• Creating retirement objectives and philosophy, including behavioural economics
• Analyzing the gap between the current state of the retirement plan and the objectives
• Creating alternative design options to close the gap
• Narrowing options to the "short list"
• Conducting a demographic and financial analysis of the options
• Modifying the options to balance demographic and financial objectives
• Creating the pilot transition design and performing the final gap analysis
• Implementing the new plan design

Here's how we've helped clients in the past

This is just one example of how a client used our retirement plan design services to deliver a superior and sustainable plan to its people.

The issue

To promote higher deferrals in its defined contribution (DC) plan, a client was considering a change in their plan formula to encourage greater savings: Current plan design is 100% of contributions on the first 4% of pay; potential plan design is 50% of contributions on the first 8% of pay.

Our solution

To avoid any unintended consequences with the plan change, we suggested analyzing the DC plan population at a participant level. Looking at the overall plan statistics by employee type/group revealed relatively high averages across the board.

Through deeper data analytics of the employee group of engineers (identified by the client as a critical role to the organization), we observed that those under 35 were only deferring at or slightly above the 4% level to obtain the employer match.

We worked with the client to develop an engagement survey to better understand the reasons behind the low contribution rate. The results of our survey indicated that this cohort would not have the depth to increase their contributions past the 4% and would consequently lose part of the employer match if the formula was changed. We suggested that, in conjunction with targeted communications, the client could supplement their retirement program with a student loan repayment plan.

The result

Digging deeper into the population helped our client avoid making a change in the DC plan that would negatively affect a critical part of their employee population.

Our expertise at examining cohorts not typically reviewed in the client’s recordkeeper report provided an additional insight.